Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lina Pezzella <j4rg0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:49:19
Message-Id: e4a9ae407a1984710a0caa496bf1cd0e@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed by Brian Harring
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Apr 7, 2005, at 7:04 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
5
6 > [1] Yes, exceptions occur. Replacing sed (which works in the context
7 > of the osx os) because we label it as deficient doesn't qualify, nor
8 > despite my hatred of it, does replacing libtoolize with a gnu equiv
9 > that sucks substantially less qualify.
10
11 In the cases where a particular tool is truly inadequate our precedence
12 has been to install a second version of the tool under a prefixed name
13 (as with sed). In terms of libtoolize, Apple provides "glibtoolize"
14 which AFAIK is the gnu equivalent. As far as I've seen it "sucks less"
15 enough to be workable.
16
17 The point is that in cases where tools just won't work for our purposes
18 there are workarounds that do not involve overwriting the native tools
19 that are expected by the system to be there.
20
21 - --Lina Pezzella
22 Ebuild/Porting Co-Lead
23 Gentoo for Mac OS X
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
26
27 iD8DBQFCVWSVNJ9STR9DbYERAu4XAJwKFGXNmw4MCLp9p9Dluw/OlJO6mgCfWZA9
28 ZsH5hY/AdvZunVvIpKdfNVk=
29 =k1DU
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list