| 1 |
Georgi Georgiev ha scritto: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>I hope I am not really hijacking the thread, but: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>maillog: 25/02/2005-10:18:12(+0100): Francesco Riosa types |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>Maybe after some time it has been in the tree keyworded "-*" (testing, |
| 9 |
>>testing, testing)? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>What's the policy for "-*" v.s. "package.mask"? '-*' is pretty annoying |
| 14 |
>in my opinion. Is "-*" for really, really bad ebuilds or something? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
Don't know well about gentoo policy about that, in this case, since it's |
| 18 |
something completely new I suggest the "-*" like a request to be tested |
| 19 |
from a developer on every arch before leave it at user testing. |
| 20 |
In every case we are speaking of a still non-existing stuff. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives