1 |
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 05:19:50 +0000, Brian Jackson <iggy@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> A. CALM DOWN |
3 |
> B. One of the main reasons some devs like to push the limits of what can be |
4 |
> in files/ is because it takes up to 8 hours for things to get to mirrors |
5 |
> sometimes. |
6 |
the time it takes could be changed |
7 |
|
8 |
> C. There are some things that are going to be in the portage tree that are |
9 |
> large that not everyone needs. That's just the way it is. No, we don't like |
10 |
> it. No, there isn't much we can do about it. |
11 |
yes there is you just dont want to |
12 |
|
13 |
> D. Most devs know it's a problem. Most devs are also already overworked as |
14 |
> is. |
15 |
yes i hear that excuse alot |
16 |
|
17 |
> E. If you really want to do some good, write a patch for repoman to kick |
18 |
> people in the "jimmy jammy" when they try to commit big files. |
19 |
> F. CALM DOWN |
20 |
|
21 |
well here is another idea for you 'overworked' devs |
22 |
make a new dir on rsync called patchfiles (like distfiles) ignored by |
23 |
emerge sync |
24 |
add a mirror:// item support to have emerge grab patchs requested by ebuilds |
25 |
from that rsync location |
26 |
this would allow the devs to keep their 30m mirrors |
27 |
would make rsync in general speed up for users |
28 |
rsync mirrors wouldnt be out any more space than they already are |
29 |
also this could allow a setup so patchs dont have to go into cvs |
30 |
which i think is better if gzip/bzip items are going to be in there |
31 |
|
32 |
> |
33 |
> On 11:49:34 pm 10/10/04 Allen Parker <infowolfe@×××××.com> wrote: |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > > <calm rant> |
36 |
> > > why is it that developers can't spend an extra moment or 2 |
37 |
> > > tar/bz2'ing their patchsets and uploading them to the mirrors |
38 |
> > > instead of including them where they are and making the portage |
39 |
> > > tree bulge from the seams? there are patchsets that are currently |
40 |
> > > in <pkgname>/files for packages that are only useful on a |
41 |
> > > graphical workstation... for people that run servers, this seems |
42 |
> > > like quite a bit of cruft. there are currently 100,712 files in |
43 |
> > > /usr/portage... does this seem a little ridiculous to anyone else? |
44 |
> > > </calm rant> |
45 |
> > > |
46 |
> > > <angry rant> |
47 |
> > > why don't we put more stuff in mirror://gentoo/ ?? ${FILESDIR} has |
48 |
> > > too much SHIT in it... i appreciate that patches, etc have been |
49 |
> > > placed there... but we REALLY need to find a better place. I don't |
50 |
> > > need my emerge sync's taking 45 minutes on average on a 5Mbit line |
51 |
> > > in france... *45 minutes* ...just PLEASE keep the SHIT out of the |
52 |
> > > portage tree. |
53 |
> > > |
54 |
> > > SHIT: (noun); |
55 |
> > > 1. useless stuff that has no business being in my portage tree. |
56 |
> > > 2. stuff that i'll never have use for... see #1 |
57 |
> > > 3. anything related to X11, kde, gnome, etc on a server. |
58 |
> > > </angry rant> |
59 |
> > > |
60 |
> > > that's my 2/100ths of a monetary unit. |
61 |
> > > |
62 |
> > > -- |
63 |
> > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
64 |
> > > |
65 |
> > |
66 |
> |
67 |
> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> |
70 |
> -- |
71 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
72 |
> |
73 |
> |
74 |
|
75 |
-- |
76 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |