1 |
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 14:53 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> the herd of voip packages is constantly growing and according to |
5 |
> "herdstat -p voip" we already have 60 packages in the voip herd. Those are |
6 |
> currently in the categories net-misc, net-im, net-libs, dev-libs and |
7 |
> media-libs. Most of them would fit perfectly into a new net-voip category. |
8 |
> Those are enough packages to allow the creation of a new category. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> More important than the current packages I think it is to put new packages |
11 |
> into the more precise net-voip instead of net-misc/net-im. For example some |
12 |
> packages in my overlay [1] maintained by the fellow gentoo users peper and |
13 |
> fuoco. Also there is a lot of stuff waiting in stkn's private voip overlay |
14 |
> |
15 |
> The 47 voip packages in net-misc and net-im should be moved over to the new |
16 |
> category definitely, you can get the list with: |
17 |
> herdstat -p voip | grep -e net-im -e net-misc |
18 |
> From the others I think dev-libs/ilbc-rfc3951 should be moved, too. |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad. |
22 |
See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg |
23 |
moves are bad. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Any objections, problems with the plan, comments? |
26 |
|
27 |
Sure I'll step up and say I object to the part of your plan which |
28 |
involves a shitton of pkgmoves. Moving pkgs from existing categories |
29 |
into another category causes numerous problems that portage can't solve |
30 |
as easy as the rest of us might think so please just don't do that |
31 |
part. I've got no objection to the creation of a new category for *new* |
32 |
packages. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> [1] http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/dev/genstef/net-im |
38 |
> |
39 |
-- |
40 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
41 |
Gentoo Linux |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |