Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Gentoo news extension: Display-If-Visible
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:34:29
Message-Id: CAJ0EP426Pxmqy7uwG_wxg-fPCJofD+oOEWn-JjntMs0Z77z0uA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Gentoo news extension: Display-If-Visible by "Michał Górny"
1 On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > On śro, 2017-05-24 at 13:13 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
3 >> Many news items are only relevant when upgrading a package from one
4 >> version to another. For fresh installs, the user does not need to take
5 >> any action. A good example of this is the recent gcc upgrade from 4.9
6 >> to 5.
7 >>
8 >> In this context, it is often desirable to inform the user of a major
9 >> change in a package before they upgrade it. This would give them time
10 >> to prepare, and allow to skip the upgrade until they are ready.
11 >>
12 >> This is technically possible with the current news item format by
13 >> using a Display-If-Installed header. However, this has a few problems
14 >> depending on how you format the dependency spec.
15 >>
16 >> Display-If-Installed: cat/pkg
17 >> This will be displayed to too many users.
18 >>
19 >> Display-If-Installed: >=cat/pkg-ver
20 >> This will be displayed to users only after they have upgraded.
21 >>
22 >> Display-If-Installed: <cat/pkg-ver
23 >> This targets the right people, but the message will be displayed too
24 >> early for stable users.
25 >>
26 >> I would like to introduce a new header "Display-If-Visible". This
27 >> would restrict display of the news item to users for which the given
28 >> dependency is visible according to their ACCEPT_KEYWORDS and
29 >> package.accept_keywords settings.
30 >>
31 >> Example usage:
32 >>
33 >> Display-If-Installed: <sys-devel/gcc-5
34 >> Display-If-Visible: >=sys-devel/gcc-5
35 >>
36 >> Comments?
37 >>
38 >
39 > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/7f5ff2c0a844050f846516a6af39bb06
40 >
41 > (and the replies to that)
42
43 Thanks for the pointer. I suppose I'll just draft something for the GLEP change.