| 1 |
23.09.2013 22:29, Markos Chandras пишет: |
| 2 |
> On 09/23/2013 03:07 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> we have 'stable', 'dev' and 'exp'; the difference between 'dev' and |
| 5 |
>> 'exp' is unclear to me. it could be changed so that broken deps in |
| 6 |
>> 'dev' profiles are a repoman error (without -d) but without stable |
| 7 |
>> keywords. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Alexis. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> I believe the 'exp' profile makes no sense. It might did in the past, |
| 12 |
> but I believe we are fine having only 'stable' and 'dev'. So unless I am |
| 13 |
> missing something obvious, 'dev' can be used to express ~arch only |
| 14 |
> architectures whether they are in a good or bad state. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think current dedication of pure-unstable arches on well-maintained |
| 18 |
and dependency consistent arches in dev and arches where dependency |
| 19 |
consistency is someway broken(Prefix) makes sense. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Unless somebody wants to clean up some mess i have seen in Prefix deps |
| 22 |
by fulling package.use.mask in prefix profiles with tons of deps. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Anyway, we have apropriate options in repoman for checking on dev and |
| 25 |
exp profiles, and, regarding the Prefix, i think we can try to move |
| 26 |
prefix profiles to dev when Prefix tree will be merged with gentoo-x86 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 30 |
Gentoo developer |
| 31 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 32 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |
| 33 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives