1 |
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 01:18 am, Jeff Stuart wrote: |
2 |
> I have to agree with Allen on this. I submitted some ebuilds for some |
3 |
> WindowMaker apps almost 3 or 4 months ago. Since then, I've moved on and |
4 |
> switched WM's twice. LOL Yet, my ebuilds are STILL sitting in bugzilla yet |
5 |
> to be reviewed. Every once in a while, I'll get a comment about one or two |
6 |
> of the submitted ebuilds. And to be frank, since I'm not using it anymore, |
7 |
> I could care LESS what happens to em. |
8 |
|
9 |
I don't want to seem condescending here, but you're saying that you submitted |
10 |
ebuilds for programs that you yourself aren't even continuining to use yet |
11 |
are irritated that someone else didn't pick them up for maintainership? |
12 |
|
13 |
It's not that there's some pending queue for ebuilds to be reviewed; they |
14 |
simply need to have an audience. And one person in that audience has to be a |
15 |
developer. My guess is that there just wasn't much interest by any current |
16 |
dev. for these applications. |
17 |
|
18 |
If there's no developer who is willing to take on an ebuild, yet there's a |
19 |
substantial need for it within the community, then we simply need another |
20 |
developer. But somebody has to be willing to fill that niche. |
21 |
|
22 |
I think of it like this: I used to be the coordinator of the KDevelop project, |
23 |
and we would get feature requests all of the time. Some of the good ideas |
24 |
were relatively minor. Others, while also good ideas, were these major |
25 |
undertakings that nobody already on the team was all that interested in. If |
26 |
someone were willing to come along and do what it took to implement them, |
27 |
they would be welcome with open arms. But instead, it was easier for people |
28 |
to just tell us what they wanted. |
29 |
|
30 |
> It annoys me (on a scale of 1 - 10 where 10 is full blown anger, it's |
31 |
> definitely a 1!) that user submitted ebuilds can take a WHILE to get |
32 |
> approved. (Note: the ebuilds that I had submitted for the XFCE 4 rc |
33 |
> releases on the other hand were accepted within days of me submitting |
34 |
> em. :)) Kinda removes the feel that "power" is in the user's hands. |
35 |
|
36 |
The power is always in the users' hands. I think you'll agree that you can |
37 |
basically do anything you want with Gentoo. The only caveat is that if you |
38 |
want your ebuild to become an offical part of Gentoo, it needs a developer to |
39 |
sponsor it. If that doesn't happen, and you still really want it to be a |
40 |
part of Gentoo, then you need to seek out becoming a developer yourself. It |
41 |
is possible. It just takes some effort. :) |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |