| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
All, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
~ I recently noticed fpc (free pascal compiler) in the tree, took |
| 7 |
interest in it, and am now actively maintaining it. During this |
| 8 |
process, a few things came into play: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
1) The idea of a new dev-pascal category |
| 11 |
2) A pascal herd |
| 12 |
3) Getting some more pascal stuff into the tree |
| 13 |
4) A possible new keyword added to make.conf called |
| 14 |
PFLAGS/PASCAL_FLAGS/PASFLAGS/WHATEVER_BEGINS_WITH_P_AND_CAN_BE_UPPERCASED |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Which leads to the following: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
In regards to #1: need to see what the overall impression is on that |
| 19 |
In regards to #2: need to see if there's people that would be |
| 20 |
interested in joining this new herd |
| 21 |
In regards to #3: depends on #1 and #2 |
| 22 |
In regards to #4: same here, see what the overal impression is. I |
| 23 |
mainly propose this as, with C[XX]FLAGS, I'm sure that people would |
| 24 |
want the most control possible over the output flags. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
At this point it's merely an up in the air issue. I'd like to see |
| 27 |
what overall impressions are before I go and do anything with it. I'm |
| 28 |
also asking that anyone with interest for helping in #2 to please |
| 29 |
contact me off the list. Thanks ahead of time for any comments! |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- -- |
| 32 |
Chris White <chriswhite@g.o> |
| 33 |
- ------------------------ |
| 34 |
Sound | Video | Security |
| 35 |
ChrisWhite @ irc.freenode.net |
| 36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 38 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
iD8DBQFBJshZFdQwWVoAgN4RArMJAKD8LcHYu1CHxhdPeUGJb6DP2TIwJACgjyv7 |
| 41 |
x3X5XODg/DanLrwg/um9ybc= |
| 42 |
=r5vv |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives