1 |
drobbins@g.o wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:28:14AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: |
4 |
> > Achim Gottinger wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > Since Suse 7.1 ships with 2.4/reiserfs I think this problem is solved. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > Well it seems to be still unsolved. |
10 |
> > > I tested the lates kernel 2.4.1-ac17 with and without nfs and lvm patches all with |
11 |
> > > the same result. |
12 |
> > > I posted a message to the reiserfs mailinglist. |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Here are the answers |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Well, this is known weakness of reiserfs in its current state: it creates very |
18 |
> > big holes in file very poorly. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Thanks, |
21 |
> > vs |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > This isn't a bug, its a design flaw. reiserfs creates a little slower than |
24 |
> > ext2 does, and this test is really benchmarking the hole creation speed. |
25 |
> > We don't do it quickly, but the holes do get created. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > -chris |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > ------------------- |
30 |
> > I added a patch to the lates glibc-2.2.2 package that increases the timeout in |
31 |
> > test-lfs so it should compile. |
32 |
> > Since there are other problems with glibc-2.2.2/binutils-2.1.10.0.7 I will update |
33 |
> > glibc-2.2.1 too. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> OK, thanks Achim. Make sure to forward this information to Ulrich Drepper so that |
36 |
> maybe he can add a fix to the next version of glibc. |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
I did this but it seems Ulrich is not interested. :-/ |
40 |
|
41 |
achim~ |
42 |
|
43 |
> |
44 |
> Best Regards, |
45 |
> |
46 |
> -- |
47 |
> Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
48 |
> President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org |
49 |
> Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> _______________________________________________ |
52 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
53 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
54 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |