| 1 |
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:23:39PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 04:15:10 -0700 |
| 3 |
> Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > If PMS is going to be discussed in some form, it's a fair request |
| 5 |
> > that folks have an easily readable version. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The relevant sentence was provided. Had you bothered to read the |
| 8 |
> agenda, you would know this. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Council: if you wouldn't mind and have time, kindly extend the |
| 11 |
discussion of PMS beyond version components (which I already clarified |
| 12 |
where the potential issue is) to the future of it, current behaviour |
| 13 |
from (frankly) the sole developer of it, how involved other package |
| 14 |
managers (say... portage, the biggest out there) are in the process. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It's frankly a discussion long overdue. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Cheers. |
| 19 |
~harring |
Archives