1 |
On 30 August 2015 at 21:37, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> In addition to the other services a distro provides, a big one is having |
3 |
> one single place to file bugs, instead of a couple hundred different bug |
4 |
> tracker accounts on a half-dozen tracker software bases, and that's not |
5 |
> even counting the ones (like the perl trackers that Kent mentions) that |
6 |
> are virtually impossible for a user to find at all. |
7 |
|
8 |
And there are cases where there *is* no contactable upstream. This is |
9 |
disturbingly frequent in proprietary software, like games, where your |
10 |
only report channels are other people who don't know waxing lyrical on |
11 |
what they think the problem is on support forums, which is no better a |
12 |
bug tracker in practice than "Have you tried googling?" |
13 |
|
14 |
Or upstream might be a monolithic giant like Google where their |
15 |
upstream bug tracking is some pointless forum where you get ignored by |
16 |
the people actually working on things. |
17 |
|
18 |
I really love it, and take pride in the fact that OpenSource Linux |
19 |
vendors provide better technical support to their users, and at no |
20 |
cost, than proprietary products can deliver at a fee. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Kent |
26 |
|
27 |
KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |