Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream?
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 10:02:13
Message-Id: CAATnKFD2sAZN=OyvRPp2MmZ3kgu+JywHXQkjd5HTx_Pd+eEzVQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Better way to direct upstream bugs upstream? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 30 August 2015 at 21:37, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > In addition to the other services a distro provides, a big one is having
3 > one single place to file bugs, instead of a couple hundred different bug
4 > tracker accounts on a half-dozen tracker software bases, and that's not
5 > even counting the ones (like the perl trackers that Kent mentions) that
6 > are virtually impossible for a user to find at all.
7
8 And there are cases where there *is* no contactable upstream. This is
9 disturbingly frequent in proprietary software, like games, where your
10 only report channels are other people who don't know waxing lyrical on
11 what they think the problem is on support forums, which is no better a
12 bug tracker in practice than "Have you tried googling?"
13
14 Or upstream might be a monolithic giant like Google where their
15 upstream bug tracking is some pointless forum where you get ignored by
16 the people actually working on things.
17
18 I really love it, and take pride in the fact that OpenSource Linux
19 vendors provide better technical support to their users, and at no
20 cost, than proprietary products can deliver at a fee.
21
22
23
24 --
25 Kent
26
27 KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL

Replies