Archives
Archives
| From: | Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | bdharring <bdharring@××××.edu> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: re-organizing our source mirrors into two categories: full and partial | ||
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:39:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20030726123717.GY9959@mail.lieber.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: re-organizing our source mirrors into two categories: full and partial by bdharring |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:33:07AM -0500 or thereabouts, bdharring wrote: |
| 2 | > Also, are you advocating the distfile mirrors carry a *complete* |
| 3 | > distfile mirror, or a partial? I'm curious what the space savings |
| 4 | > would be... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Distfile mirrors would be required to carry the full /distfiles directory. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | --kurt |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: re-organizing our source mirrors into two categories: full and partial | Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: re-organizing our source mirrors into two categories: full and partial | bdharring <bdharring@××××.edu> |