| 1 |
Dawid Węgliński wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello fellow developers and users. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'd like to know your opinion of bug #243050 [1] |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> 01:18:59 cla @| If user bothers to patch his kernel, he can bother |
| 7 |
> to add proper package.keyword line, imo. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
++ |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> 01:21:52 hparker @| Or maybe get the patches added to gentoo-sources |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
or ++ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
maybe we can get the pm's to implement this as EAPI="999,999,999.99" |
| 16 |
I suggest a syntax of "virtual/kernel:::::::user_patched" |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
On a more serious note, How can we confirm a package is stable when we |
| 19 |
can't confirm the kernel it depends on is? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I would have no problem with gentoo-sources also including a use flag(s) |
| 22 |
( or not ) and having it add patches to support software we have within |
| 23 |
the tree. I have no say in that tho. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Alistair |
Archives