1 |
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 20:15 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 23 May 2020 22:41:02 -0400 |
3 |
> Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > Could you please add this flag to package.use.force? I don't think we |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Sounds more like a case for package.use.stable.force or something. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> For non-stable, we don't give guarantees about well-supported, only |
10 |
> that there will be bugs, and they should probably be reported. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ( It doesn't tend to 'break' your system, it just makes upgrades fail, |
13 |
> runtime itself seems unaffected in general ) |
14 |
|
15 |
If it creates an invalid environment that is known to break packages |
16 |
and is not QA-sanctioned, it should be masked. Period. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
Michał Górny |