1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> Olivier CrĂȘte wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Mon, 2006-17-04 at 13:05 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Alec Warner wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>> Well the semantics of the blocker is that the new driver won't work |
9 |
>>>> with the old server; is that true? Or just the old drivers won't |
10 |
>>>> work with the new server? |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> New server requires new drivers. Old server requires old drivers. |
13 |
>>> There is no valid combination of new and old. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Then you should probably has new drivers block old servers and new |
17 |
>> servers block old drivers... |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> OK, let's think about the results of this. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> New drivers block old servers: |
23 |
> Rather, why wouldn't new drivers depend on a new server? This makes |
24 |
> sense and is already what we're doing. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> New servers block old drivers: |
27 |
> This will require people to uninstall all their drivers to upgrade |
28 |
> their server. It will not automatically reinstall them in the 'emerge -u |
29 |
> xorg-server' case, but it _should_ reinstall them in the 'emerge -u |
30 |
> world' case _if_ they're using the xorg-x11 metabuild. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
I'll take TGL's suggestion, New server PDEPENDS on new drivers. |
34 |
|
35 |
New drivers need new server, old drivers won't work with new server, |
36 |
doesn't touch the old driver ebuilds at all; I don't particularly see a |
37 |
down side ;) |
38 |
|
39 |
> I'm not sure whether portage does a --deep by default now, but I think |
40 |
> that's what is necessary for correct behavior in the 'emerge -u world' |
41 |
> case. |
42 |
It doesn't. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Thanks, |
45 |
> Donnie |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |