1 |
On Monday 14 of January 2008 02:24:53 Mark Loeser wrote: |
2 |
> Here is a newer revision of the GLEP. I still have multiple methods of |
3 |
> solving this problem (mostly because I want and *need* input from people |
4 |
> as to what they would prefer). Please tell me what you would want to |
5 |
> use so I can come up with a more precise specification. What exactly do |
6 |
> we need this system to do that we can't do now? Is overriding the USE |
7 |
> flag with use.local.desc sufficient and we just need to document the |
8 |
> current solution properly? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Please...let me know how you feel about this. |
11 |
|
12 |
Tbh, I don't have any issues with the current solution, but I may be missing |
13 |
something. "Rationale" doesn't seem to help though, afaics it is just saying |
14 |
that the current behaviour needs to be documented and fwiw PMS draft covers |
15 |
this already: |
16 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spb/pms.pdf - section 3.4.3 |
17 |
|
18 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/gleps/glep-0054.html |
19 |
|
20 |
Please, don't use an already assigned GLEP number, it's a bit confusing. Note |
21 |
that 55 is taken as well. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Best Regards, |
25 |
Piotr Jaroszyński |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |