Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:44:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090224164351.7c30fac7@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) by Joe Peterson |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:36:29 -0700 |
| 2 | Joe Peterson <lavajoe@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > > You could use the same absurd argument to say that PN and PV |
| 4 | > > shouldn't be in the filename... |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > No...! |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > They are needed because: |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > 1) versions of the *content*, not the *format* are needed for |
| 11 | > uniqueness |
| 12 | |
| 13 | So why's PN in there then? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | > 2) it makes sense to have these in the filename, but not |
| 16 | > internal meta-data |
| 17 | |
| 18 | For those of us who understand the process, it makes sense to have EAPI |
| 19 | in the filename too. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) | Robert Bridge <robert@××××××××.com> |