Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 04:57:59
Message-Id: 20101203230222.069629e8@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds by "Diego Elio Pettenò"
1 On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:29:45 +0100
2 Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > Il giorno ven, 03/12/2010 alle 19.46 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
5 > >
6 > > This has come up enough times that we should write some common code.
7 >
8 > Or resume the idea to simply provide a separate variable for
9 > number-of-jobs rather than relying purely on MAKEOPTS.
10
11 That's not a bad idea, but I think we'd still need to fall back to MAKEOPTS
12 parsing if that variable was not set.
13
14 --
15 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
16 toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
17 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass review for Gnome 2.32 and waf ebuilds Cyprien Nicolas <c.nicolas@×××××.com>