| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 29-04-2013 16:14:51 +0900, heroxbd wrote: |
| 4 |
> In GLEP22[1], reasonable defaults has been introduced to prevent the |
| 5 |
> explosion of keywords. With the growth of Gentoo Prefix, however, a |
| 6 |
> substantial amount of keywords are introduced. Among them, duplex |
| 7 |
> information exists. For example, an ebuild keyworded x86-linux(Gentoo |
| 8 |
> Prefix on x86 linux) will certainly build on x86 (Gentoo vanilla on x86 |
| 9 |
> linux). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Likely, but not necessary true. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Furthermore if the ebuild has "amd64" keyword, it will certainly |
| 14 |
> build on amd64-linux too. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Somewhat likely, but absolutely not true. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Therefore we propose the following cartesian product extension to |
| 19 |
> keyword system. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
We added the keywords as is, to uniquely define which systems it works |
| 22 |
on. Assuming something will work because it should be similar is (and |
| 23 |
has been proven in the past to be) wrong. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
My €0.02 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 29 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives