Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ruby keywording
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:53:33
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Ruby keywording by Thomas Kahle
1 On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 23:17 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
3 > Ruby is an interpreted language, I don't see any
4 > point in having every arch team do the testing for every small package.
5 > Could the ruby team add ~x86 themselves after testing on ~amd64, or are
6 > there compelling reasons to not do this?
8 This discussion has come up in the past, not just for Ruby. The
9 consensus seems to be that it's better to keep handling everything by
10 the arch teams, since there may be other issues besides compilation that
11 may cause differences on arches. I know of several arch-specific bugs in
12 interpreted Ruby code myself.
14 It's also a matter of where to stop. Each new keyword added in the end
15 is an additional maintenenance burden for that arch. I don't want to
16 make that decision since I won't be doing the work.
18 Hans


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature