Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:16:20
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:36:30 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o> wrote:

> Some packages have new releases more than once a month and sometimes it's reasonable > to not skip stabilization of any version. Given version of a package is usually no > longer tested by users after release of a newer version, so I suggest the following > change to the policy of stabilizations: > Stabilization of given version of a package can be requested if this version has been > in the tree for at least 10 days and a newer version of this package has been added > to the tree.
I thought the arch teams were already overworked. Why do you need every last version stable? -- fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. gcc-porting, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature