1 |
Francesco Riosa wrote: |
2 |
>> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
[...] |
5 |
>> "{{{ A hypothetical example: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I used mysql-4.1.16-r30 and I have a locally encoded (say Shift_JIS) |
8 |
>> database. I have DBD-mysql compiled against that and a package FOO using |
9 |
>> that works as expected. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Some package wants >=mysql-5.0.0 and DBD-mysql, and because mysql is |
12 |
>> SLOTed, portage says ok, emerges mysql-5.0.18-r30 and rebuilds |
13 |
>> DBD-mysql against it. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Oops *you* need to tell portage to rebuild DBD-mysql. Difficult that a |
17 |
> package will want mysql >= something, but take this is an example, so |
18 |
> it's ok. |
19 |
|
20 |
Yup, /me bad. The usual way for a package using a language binding is to |
21 |
depend on that bindig (dev-perl/DBD-mysql-VVV). |
22 |
|
23 |
All my worries were for the case when the latest stable dev-perl/DBD-mysql |
24 |
is compiled against the latest SLOTed mysql-5.1.x and is being used to |
25 |
access data on an old (SLOTed or not; localhost or some remote host) server. |
26 |
But I guess then the problem will be entirely in dev-perl/DBD-mysql being |
27 |
unable to connect to older servers :-) |
28 |
|
29 |
At this moment I should say "Sorry for the wasted bandwidth/time" :-| |
30 |
|
31 |
[...] |
32 |
|
33 |
> Better ? |
34 |
|
35 |
Times better! Hypothetical problem is solved, thank you for your time! |
36 |
|
37 |
Kalin. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
|[ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ]| |
41 |
+-> http://ThinRope.net/ <-+ |
42 |
|[ ______________________ ]| |
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |