1 |
Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:34:34 -0600 |
3 |
> Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Michał Górny wrote: |
6 |
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:40:01 -0600 |
7 |
>>> Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>>>> I keep hoping that all the smart people involved in this will see |
10 |
>>>>>> the mess it is creating. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed |
11 |
>>>>>> but I'm sharp enough to see the mess this is going to create and |
12 |
>>>>>> I'm just a desktop user. I feel sorry for people with more |
13 |
>>>>>> complicated systems or remote ones. |
14 |
>>>>> The mess was created by people shouting 'hey, real men use |
15 |
>>>>> separate /usr for no good reason! Be awesome like us'. |
16 |
>>>>> |
17 |
>>>> I think it is more like people do that when they have a good reason |
18 |
>>>> to do so. I plan to put mine on /usr when I get the chance and |
19 |
>>>> know that this init crap isn't going to break my rig. It's not |
20 |
>>>> being "awesome" either. |
21 |
>>> Remind me of a single good reason. Last time I heard those were |
22 |
>>> mostly hacks and laziness. |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> I already stated the reason. I'm going to put /usr on LVM. That is |
26 |
>> not only a good reason, it is a GREAT reason. |
27 |
> It is a hack. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
How is putting /usr, /var, /home and such on LVM a hack? Your |
31 |
definition of hack must have some really low standards. Does installing |
32 |
Linux fall into your "hack" category to? |
33 |
|
34 |
Dale |
35 |
|
36 |
:-) :-) |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
40 |
|
41 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
42 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |