From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting | ||
Date: | Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:22:16 | ||
Message-Id: | 20071.28643.758959.906951@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting by "Tomáš Chvátal" |
1 | >>>>> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011, TomᨠChvátal wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Start collecting ideas for EAPI5. |
4 | |
5 | I suggest that EAPI 5 should include the two features that have been |
6 | omitted from EAPI 4 [1,2]. |
7 | |
8 | Apart from this, I think we should be more careful for the next EAPI, |
9 | in order to avoid such long delays as we had with EAPI 4. One possible |
10 | solution would be to only accept features where a preliminary |
11 | implementation in Portage is available. |
12 | |
13 | > I myself would like PATCHES array to be default in src_prepare phase |
14 | > and some solution for runtime optional deps, Instead of elog in |
15 | > postinst something like Recommended from rpm. |
16 | |
17 | Looks reasonable (if an implementation is ready). Although I don't |
18 | understand how it is related to rpm. |
19 | |
20 | Ulrich |
21 | |
22 | [1] <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=9d2b8ee57bf3be941cfdfe13650952d91b9edfdc> |
23 | [2] <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=409fccc10861c361f37a959195d7581a5c376dd9> |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting | "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> |