Re: [gentoo-dev] Mozilla 1.0.1 maybe serious problem!!

[whoracle]

On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:36:52 +0200
Tony Clark <tclark@×××××.com> wrote:

create a file and name it libc++mem.c
then use your favourite editor add these lines into the file:

void *__builtin_new(int size) {return (void*)malloc(size);}
void *__builtin_vec_new(int size) {return __builtin_new(size);}
void *__builtin_delete(void *ptr) {free(ptr);}
void *__builtin_vec_delete(void *ptr) {__builtin_delete(ptr);} 

save and compile with  

gcc -shared -fPIC -o libc++mem.so libc++mem.c

copy the libc++mem.so to /usr/lib/mozilla and restart mozilla


> On Thursday 17 October 2002 19.04, Matthew Kennedy wrote:
> > Tony Clark <tclark@×××××.com> writes:
> > > > Certainly not. I'm talking of a fresh gentoo 1.4_rc1 install. No gcc <3
> > > > library there.
> > >
> > > That makes me feel a little better knowing I am not alone.  GCC2 has been
> > > no where near this drive.  I fdisked it and mke2fs on the weekend prior
> > > to installing 1.4-rc1.  What I get is
> > > tony@power flash-0.4.10 $ /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla-bin
> > > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library
> > > /opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so [/opt/netscape/plugins/npflash.so:
> > > undefined symbol: __dso_handle]
> >
> > Okay, so what we have here is one fresh 1.4_rc1 install with
> > netscape-flash and mozilla working "solid" and another fresh 1.4_rc1
> > install with netscape-flash and mozilla broken?
>
> I'm a little confused I must admit.  I had flash working with moz1.0.0  I
> upgraded to moz1.0.1 and flash broke.  I am not sure if was gplflash or
> macromedia working with moz1.0.0.  Neither works with moz1.0.1.  Macromedia
> causes moz to crash and burn where as gplflash crashes.  I'm not sure if this
> means anything but macromedia does work with konqueror.
>
> tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@g.o
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev