1 |
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 |
3 |
> Alex Alexander <alex.alexander@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > @preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it |
5 |
> > should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production |
6 |
> > boxes for years without any issues :) |
7 |
> |
8 |
> ...and here we see the problem. You think that "I haven't noticed it |
9 |
> break" means "it works". |
10 |
> |
11 |
> The problem with preserved-libs (and emerge --jobs, for that matter) is |
12 |
> that the design is "I can think of a few ways where it might break, so |
13 |
> I'll hard-code in special cases to handle those, but in general I |
14 |
> can't think of what other problems there are so it's fine". That's a |
15 |
> bad way of doing things. |
16 |
|
17 |
Then don't use it. Reality is, gentoo does. |
18 |
|
19 |
If you don't like that fact, I suggest you stick to exherbo. |
20 |
|
21 |
Related, why the hell are you still even around here? |
22 |
|
23 |
You literally send more mail to our dev ml then to exherbos. |
24 |
|
25 |
I wouldn't care if it weren't the fact your gentoo dev posts |
26 |
generally consist of "xyz is stupid, as is the people behind it" |
27 |
whether it be portage, udev, council, etc, take your pick. |
28 |
|
29 |
~harring (being rather tired of the broken record). |