1 |
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 11/07/12 06:40 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
6 |
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
7 |
>> wrote: |
8 |
>>> Being able to choose not to run systemd at all? If there's no |
9 |
>>> need to build systemd, than what it requires is irrelevant. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> I think this discussion is getting sidetracked. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> This didn't start out as a discussion about whether everybody |
14 |
>> should have to have systemd on their systems - the answer to that |
15 |
>> is no. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> The question is whether we should have a virtual for udev. Right |
18 |
>> now we're not sure how that is going to be packaged as far as |
19 |
>> systemd is concerned, so it is premature to make that decision. |
20 |
>> However, if we do decide to fork udev then that means we'd almost |
21 |
>> certainly need to have a virtual. At that point we'd have two |
22 |
>> different udev implementations in the tree - the fork and the one |
23 |
>> that comes bundled with systemd. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Where things get dicey is if the two udev implementations start to |
26 |
>> diverge and packages need to behave differently depending on which |
27 |
>> one is installed - that would become a bit of a mess. Hopefully it |
28 |
>> won't come to that. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> ..although it possibly could come to that, if the fork maintains |
33 |
> installation in /{bin,sbin,lib} while systemd-udev follows the |
34 |
> upstream move to /usr/{bin,sbin,lib} |
35 |
|
36 |
I don't know the devs' familiarity or positions on it (or the history |
37 |
of it here), but it's potentially relevant if you're looking at udev |
38 |
and the /{bin,sbin,lib} vs /usr/{bin,sbin,lib} split. |
39 |
|
40 |
Walter Dnes (very active over in gentoo-user) has put a lot of work |
41 |
into testing and documenting mdev as an alternative for udev. There's |
42 |
been a good deal of success there, up to and including it working with |
43 |
GNOME 2. The work's been documented on the wiki: |
44 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
:wq |