| 1 |
--On Monday, June 20, 2005 07:34:11 +0300 Rumen Yotov <rumen_yotov@×××.bg> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hi, |
| 5 |
> Recently began using flawfinder& rats and they're working (logging |
| 6 |
> things). For now don't have time to look at the logs (beside *me* needing |
| 7 |
> more time to check them), so is there some place/person which |
| 8 |
> collects/is_interested in such info. Maybe some meta-bug or other, or |
| 9 |
> just send they upstream (if correct)? |
| 10 |
> Any experiences with them, are they correct? |
| 11 |
> Thanks. Rumen. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
No, they're very little practical use. If you're stuck and need an "entry |
| 14 |
point" to start auditing from, they may give you a list of places to start |
| 15 |
looking, but this is effectively no better than `grep strcat *.c`. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
------------------------------------- |
| 19 |
taviso@××××××××××××.org | finger me for my gpg key. |
| 20 |
------------------------------------------------------- |
Archives