| 1 |
Anthony Gorecki wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday, February 28, 2005 11:59 pm, Stuart Longland wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>...and some email clients (KMail comes to mind) are even able to |
| 5 |
>>directly use this information. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Do we have any Mutt users that can comment on support for this? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Something tells me this is another one that supports this -- but I'm not |
| 10 |
sure. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
>>(I'm tempted to do some maildrop/xfilter/perl magic to emulate these |
| 14 |
>>features though) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Procmail rules are horrifying enough to be helpful as well :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
lol Don't remind me of procmail. I used to use it... the moment I heard |
| 19 |
about maildrop, I dropped procmail quick smart, and haven't looked back. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Procmail, while being a very good workhorse, the syntax of its files is |
| 22 |
pathetic IMHO. (Just like another well-known mail package, Sendmail) It |
| 23 |
honestly looks like someone's beaten their head against the keyboard.... |
| 24 |
if you're not familiar with it -- it's enough for someone to want to |
| 25 |
contribute in the same manner. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
| 29 |
| Stuart Longland -oOo- http://stuartl.longlandclan.hopto.org | |
| 30 |
| Atomic Linux Project -oOo- http://atomicl.berlios.de | |
| 31 |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | |
| 32 |
| I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on a tape somewhere | |
| 33 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
Archives