| 1 |
Maybe we could branch the ebuild tree (presumably it is in CVS) and there |
| 2 |
could be the STABLE tree and the CURRENT tree. This would cease to ever be |
| 3 |
a problem again. While I am at it, I think things would be smoother if we |
| 4 |
could use cvsup rather than rsync. I think it works better (rsync seems to |
| 5 |
have a bug that nobody has been able to fix). |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Tom Veldhouse |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 10 |
From: "Alan" <alan@×××××.org> |
| 11 |
To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
| 12 |
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:11 PM |
| 13 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] when do new ebuilds get put in portage? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:23:37PM -0700, Frank Riley wrote: |
| 17 |
> > I submitted a new ebuild (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4459) |
| 18 |
on |
| 19 |
> > 7/2/02 and last made some changes to it on 7/11/02. This ebuild still |
| 20 |
has |
| 21 |
> > not been put into portage. What is the expected turnaround time on new |
| 22 |
> > ebuilds? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> There is a freeze on right now for 1.4 to get current bugs gone, and due |
| 25 |
> to that a lot of new ebuilds aren't being put in. I assume that when |
| 26 |
> we're unfrozen the bugzilla ebuilds will start appearing. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> alan |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> Alan "Arcterex" <alan@×××××.org> -=][=- http://arcterex.net |
| 32 |
> "I used to herd dairy cows. Now I herd lusers. Apart from the isolation, I |
| 33 |
> think I preferred the cows. They were better conversation, easier to milk, |
| 34 |
and |
| 35 |
> if they annoyed me enough, I could shoot them and eat them." -Rodger |
| 36 |
Donaldson |
| 37 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 40 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 41 |
> |
Archives