Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Joseph Jezak <josejx@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 15:39:02
Message-Id: 42A7111B.5040306@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering by Jason Wever
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 > Agreed, the PPC team is very good at arbitrarily marking things stable
5 > whenever they feel like it, and often times before the maintainer does.
6
7 This is not usually our policy. However, because we moved GCC-3.4 to
8 stable before many arches, there were a number of packages that needed
9 to be marked stable for PPC in order for the stable version to even
10 compile. What should we have done in this case then?
11
12 - -Joe
13 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
15 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
16
17 iD8DBQFCpxEbwGq7BLLARfoRAogWAJ0XBbZ6v+iBB2U2t60f/cXjXo+zPgCcDOd8
18 wniWOuMxUOcqAZqKcksgRBo=
19 =IC/Y
20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering "Marcus D. Hanwell" <cryos@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] ekeyword and ordering Jason Wever <weeve@g.o>