1 |
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:43:44 -0100 |
2 |
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:02:46 -0800 |
5 |
> > Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> < snip a few arguments> |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Ciaran and Brian, |
9 |
> |
10 |
> please respect Pettery's request and move your discussion to the |
11 |
> GLEP55 thread or to another thread, but leave it out of this one. |
12 |
|
13 |
This was moved to another thread, as a casual glance at the subject |
14 |
would have told you. |
15 |
|
16 |
> please stop abusing other subscribers of the dev ml. |
17 |
> Ultimately everyone wants a resolution to this "issue" but have |
18 |
> potentially different ideas of the way to go about that. So different |
19 |
> ideas for a solution should be encouraged, not fought. |
20 |
> You're obviously free to argue your case and I'm not trying to silence |
21 |
> you, but by replying to every and single mail in quite a few cases in |
22 |
> a harsh tone, you're behaving like a "bully". Please stop that. |
23 |
|
24 |
One of the nice things about technical discussions is that it is |
25 |
entirely possible for one particular party to be entirely wrong. In |
26 |
this case, Brian is entirely wrong, and calling him on it is the |
27 |
correct thing to do. |
28 |
|
29 |
If you would prefer to see fewer emails from me, perhaps you should |
30 |
start telling people who post the same incorrect claims that have |
31 |
already been demonstrated to be false over and over again to stop it. |
32 |
One of the unfortunate tendencies the Council has shown in the past is |
33 |
to treat any unreplied-to objection as being legitimate and cause for |
34 |
an issue to be postponed, even if that issue has already been addressed |
35 |
earlier on. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Ciaran McCreesh |