| 1 |
19.11.2005, 1:07:40, Homer Parker wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 23:29 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 4 |
>> There is no technical reason why any of this is necessary and it |
| 5 |
>> doesn't |
| 6 |
>> provide any tangible benefits that I can see. If a user really wants |
| 7 |
>> to |
| 8 |
>> know someone's role within the project, they can go look it up on the |
| 9 |
>> web |
| 10 |
>> site. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I'm guessing you didn't read the logs from the council meeting where it |
| 13 |
> got stipulated that this be done. [1] I also apologize (again) for it |
| 14 |
> hitting the list the day before it was to be voted on, and stated that |
| 15 |
> it could wait if need be. Council seemed to be pleased with it enough to |
| 16 |
> allow it to pass. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> [1] <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20051013.txt> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> /me wanders off in search of his flameproof suit |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sorry, but the above does not make the thing any better than an *officially |
| 24 |
approved* PITA. Does not really answer klieber's question at all, nor does it |
| 25 |
answer the objections of other people expressed in this thread. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
jakub |
Archives