| 1 |
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:02, Spider wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> At one time I think we had an xinetd USE flag, but I'm not sure what |
| 4 |
> happened to that.... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> it would be nifty feature for builds to tag that as on/off and if on, |
| 7 |
> at least install a working xinetd.d/<foo> service. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This adds for more "out of the box" "things work" feeling |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I think there was this whole discussion on this exact thing on -dev (?) |
| 12 |
once and i think the general consensus back then was that it was not up |
| 13 |
to Gentoo to provide optional support if it is not offered by the |
| 14 |
upstream application itself or something. Someone dive into the archives |
| 15 |
:) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- foser |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives