1 |
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi, |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I want to mark the following packages stable, but they still need testing on |
6 |
> non-x86 arches: |
7 |
|
8 |
Maybe you're not the one who cares about this one, but I'll pass it to |
9 |
you anyway. (And feel free to ignore if it's not something you care |
10 |
about.) |
11 |
|
12 |
Some time ago --- about 6 months or so --- there was a discussion about |
13 |
upgrading to tetex-2.xxx. In the process of bringing a couple systems |
14 |
on line, I noticed that tetex-2.0.2 is still keyword '~sparc'. |
15 |
|
16 |
However, it installs and seems to run fine on sparc, and in fact I have |
17 |
been using it with no problems ever since some initial shakedown with |
18 |
the original tetex-2.x candidate. |
19 |
|
20 |
So, I'll offer tetex-2.0.2 as a candidate for marking stable/sparc. |
21 |
I can file this as a bug report if anyone likes, but please let me know |
22 |
if that is what you prefer. |
23 |
|
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
-- |
26 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@××××××××.com> |
27 |
Phone: (703) 392-0303 |
28 |
Fax: (703) 392-0401 |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |