| 1 |
Excerpts from Mike Frysinger's message of Wed Oct 13 23:46:43 +0200 2010: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 15:57:17 Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: |
| 3 |
> > And why putting different tasks into one function? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> for the same reason we dont have separate test binaries: test_exist, |
| 6 |
> test_file, test_dir, etc... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> it makes more sense in my mind to combine the functionality. |
| 9 |
> -mike |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So the only argument for having more complicated, less intuitive and |
| 12 |
less readable function is the old 'test' program? Please, reconsider my |
| 13 |
solution with more reason. Moreover we're using 'test' as '[[ … ]]' |
| 14 |
which changes much in readability. Next thing is that '-a' and '-o' |
| 15 |
don't strictly conform to 'test' convention. |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Amadeusz Żołnowski |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
PGP key fpr: C700 CEDE 0C18 212E 49DA 4653 F013 4531 E1DB FAB5 |
Archives