Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 02:12:22
Message-Id: 517890FD.5080500@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC by Ian Stakenvicius
1 On 04/24/2013 06:39 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
2 > On 24/04/13 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
3 >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
4 >> wrote:
5 >>> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
6 >>>>
7 >>>> This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in
8 >>>> OpenRC. I would probably call it virtual/network-manager
9 >>>> though.
10 >>>>
11 >>> You can't call it virtual/network-manager, that calls to mind,
12 >>> you know, net-misc/networkmanager. That's just too confusing
13 >>> imho. I wouldn't object to virtual/net, or pretty much anything
14 >>> else that isn't confusing. The net scripts are not a network
15 >>> manager, networkmanager, wicd, even wpa_supplicant would be
16 >>> things I would consider to be network managers.
17 >
18 >> But the oldnet scripts do run wpa_supplicant, dhcp clients, etc,
19 >> for each interface they manage.
20 >
21 >> Newnet doesn't even try that, it just manages static interfaces
22 >> and assumes that you will use a dhcp client or something like
23 >> wpa_supplicant in standalone mode to control your interfaces.
24 >
25 >
26 > virtual/network-init ?
27
28 Sounds about right. Also, rather than "gentoo-oldnet", maybe a name like
29 "gentoo-network-init" makes sense, since I suspect that the vast
30 majority of users are still using it. If newnet is split out, maybe call
31 it "openrc-newnet-init" or something.
32 --
33 Thanks,
34 Zac