| 1 |
On 13:13 Mon 10 Nov , Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> Instead of addressing archs as being slackers or not, this addresses it |
| 3 |
> as a more granular layer of looking at ebuilds. Thanks to Richard |
| 4 |
> Freeman for the initial proposal that I based this off of. Please give me |
| 5 |
> feedback on this proposal, if you think it sucks (preferably with an |
| 6 |
> explanation why), or if you think it might work. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I'm not convinced why this needs to happen, because there's no reasoning |
| 9 |
behind it here. There needs to be rationale for why this should happen |
| 10 |
with pros and cons. dang mentioned a few pros from the maintainer side, |
| 11 |
the arch team ones are pretty easy to come up with. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Thanks, |
| 15 |
Donnie |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 18 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 19 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com |
Archives