Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage on NetBSD
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:32:26
Message-Id: 4256CE3D.2000203@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage on NetBSD (was: Pluggable Hell Part 2: Fixing everything up!) by Stefan Sperling
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Stefan Sperling wrote:
5 > On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Diego Flameeyes Petten� wrote:
6 >
7 >>I was thinking of the virtual for future expansion on NetBSD and other, but
8 >>this is probably better done using an || PDEPEND when it will be needed.
9 >
10 >
11 > That's interesting.
12 > Is anybody planning or working on a NetBSD port of portage?
13
14 Diego is more than welcome to play around with NetBSD, but officially the BSD
15 team decided to worry about getting one flavor working nicely before moving on
16 to porting another one.
17
18 - --
19 Bork Bork Bork!
20
21 Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o>
22 [ BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon | vim | web-apps ]
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
25
26 iD8DBQFCVs49C3poscuANHARAjc6AJ9h6c2AsaIqs5wFKGXbVoVPkx8MDwCeKqPS
27 i1RvfuYG3khD6kPfJw/QjMs=
28 =LKMA
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage on NetBSD "Diego \\\"Flameeyes\\\" Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××××××.de>