Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:33:20 |
| Message-Id: | ca0cb2af93965bf82b49421b77fbeb9e52bcd361.camel@gentoo.org |
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Now that we have proper components for keywording and stabilization, |
| 4 | the old keywords are redundant. Nevertheless, some people still set |
| 5 | them. I would like to propose two solutions going forward. Either: |
| 6 | |
| 7 | 1. We kill both keywords, and just rely on components, or |
| 8 | |
| 9 | 2. I make NATTkA automatically add KEYWORDREQ or STABLEREQ where |
| 10 | appropriate. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Which would you prefer? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Best regards, |
| 16 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords | Joonas Niilola <juippis@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords | Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> |