| 1 |
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 16:42 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 27 December 2012 00:39, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> > Can we short cut the whole quiz process and have some "Inbound" repository |
| 6 |
>>> > until we're full git, which people can fork/commit/pull and trusted people |
| 7 |
>>> > can review submitted branches and apply them to CVS? |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> This is why I started https://github.com/yngwin/proxy-maint/ |
| 10 |
>>> Feel free to send pull requests my way. I have been very busy lately |
| 11 |
>>> with work, so I am a bit behind on my Gentoo stuff, but I should be back |
| 12 |
>>> in full swing soon. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Not to sidetrack the topic farther, but isn't this best done in our |
| 16 |
>> github/gentoo account. It is one of the main reasons we have it, to |
| 17 |
>> easily accept pull requests from users. It would also make it easier |
| 18 |
>> for more devs to participate in a group proxy-maint repo. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Certainly a sidetrack: I would like to point out that Github now |
| 21 |
> supports "Organizations" as a semantic concept. I *highly* recommend |
| 22 |
> using something like that over using an 'individual' account as an |
| 23 |
> organization. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I've been using Github "Organizations" in a private context, and it's |
| 26 |
> been working extremely well. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Ugh. Apologies. I meant to change the subject line, spent a couple |
| 29 |
minutes figuring out how to do it in GMail...and then forgot. :-| |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Fixing... |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
:wq |
Archives