Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: x11 <x11@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly x11@ project status for April 2018
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 16:51:19
Message-Id: CAEdQ38Fo35d8gzaKHVXNkshPRgiMM2-Zq3mNDfS8DDDkdL2k1g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Monthly x11@ project status for April 2018 by Matt Turner
1 On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote:
2 > == Update packages to depend on x11-base/xorg-proto ==
3 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/651286
4 >
5 > The new x11-base/xorg-proto package combines nearly all (28 in fact) of
6 > the x11-proto/* packages into one, with a very fast Meson build system.
7 > It installs on my laptop in less time than it takes to ./configure one
8 > of the individual x11-proto/ packages. I've kept empty versions of the
9 > x11-proto/ packages to ease the transition.
10 >
11 > Once the last two architectures have stabilized it (arm@ and arm64@), we
12 > can begin transitioning to depending on x11-base/xorg-proto directly
13 > instead of the x11-proto/ packages.
14
15 Question from IRC: why is the package named x11-base/xorg-proto
16 instead of x11-proto/xorgproto?
17
18 Once all of the now empty compatibility packages in x11-proto/ are
19 gone, the only remaining packages in the category will be printproto
20 and xcb-proto. The plan is to give last rites to printproto and move
21 xcb-proto to some other category, x11-base probably, and get rid of
22 x11-proto/ entirely.
23
24 The dash in the xorg-proto is just for consistency with the other
25 x11-base/ packages.