| 1 |
Paul, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Not to quibble over details, but I don't believe the case is that it is broken on x86, just that other packages that dep it can't use it yet, awaiting upstream changes (on one end or the other). I know, details details, but there is a difference between a broken package and a package that's just ahead of its time. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:56:57 +0100 |
| 6 |
Paul de Vrieze <gentoo-user@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> In that case it should have the -x86 kewword, as it is broken |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives