1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2004-07-21 19:02:06 -0400 Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> i'd like for libffi to be the default if possible, since it's |
6 |
> required for |
7 |
> gnustep to work with hardened at all, or on archs like the one i |
8 |
> happen to |
9 |
> use. also, isnt ffcall unmainained? |
10 |
|
11 |
There's a good chance that ffcall is, for all intents and purposes, |
12 |
unmaintained, although people do still regularly use it. Libffi is a |
13 |
little less "popular", but for our ends, it is really the only choice. |
14 |
Sadly, the gcc build process doesn't compile it unless java and c++ |
15 |
are enabled, but if the target is only "install-target-libffi", it |
16 |
only increased the build time from 1 minute to 7, and not to ~35 |
17 |
minutes for the entire gcc w/ java. |
18 |
|
19 |
Does anyone know if the different arch testing machines available can |
20 |
host remote X sessions? If so, I really should get in touch with the |
21 |
maintainer of the amd64 machine, and get to the root of the issues |
22 |
with the GNUstep core library and amd64. So far, gdb backtraces on |
23 |
that arch have died in the same function, so I'm crossing my fingers |
24 |
it remains only that one. |
25 |
|
26 |
__Armando Di Cianno |
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
29 |
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail.app |
30 |
|
31 |
iD8DBQFA/8CFwgiTPLI9xhcRAjxFAJ9q3l3KinQMuqEHFw+RrAxg/z3Q6QCfdY2L |
32 |
8GaUVIi+GqjxKbDSmMCjes4= |
33 |
=yCbM |
34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |