| 1 |
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is all nice but i had one issue which was like this: |
| 3 |
> i have package with use foo and package2 with use bar |
| 4 |
> and package with foo depend on package2 with bar. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> so this is not eapi2 incely handleable, what i would like to do is using |
| 7 |
> arrows or something like that |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> package2[foo?->bar] or package2[foo->bar?] |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> now i handle it that way both packages have same useflag. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
How about this: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
New syntax Expanded syntax |
| 16 |
Extension of |
| 17 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 18 |
pkg[foo?bar] foo? ( cat/pkg[bar] ) !foo? ( cat/pkg ) |
| 19 |
cat/pkg[foo?] |
| 20 |
pkg[!foo?bar] foo? ( cat/pkg ) !foo? ( cat/pkg[bar] ) |
| 21 |
cat/pkg[foo?] |
| 22 |
pkg[foo=bar] foo? ( cat/pkg[bar] ) !foo? ( cat/pkg[-bar] ) |
| 23 |
cat/pkg[foo=] |
| 24 |
pkg[!foo=bar] foo? ( cat/pkg[-bar] ) !foo? ( cat/pkg[bar] ) |
| 25 |
cat/pkg[!foo=] |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
IMO, this is simple enough to understand, and use :) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
Archives