Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 01:21:17
Message-Id: CAGbUWSKrtEx7HgcW3_tti0KR9bL-oTdi_hrr1czyu88vGq+f8Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists by R0b0t1
1 2017-12-08 2:43 GMT-05:00 R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com>:
2 >
3 > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote:
4 > > On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
5 > >> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read.
6 > >
7 > > I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about this
8 > > too many times already.
9 > >
10 >
11 > Inasmuch as a random person is likely to care, glancing at the
12 > messages shows wltjr is the more convincing of the parties involved.
13 > Having actually wasted time trying to figure out what is going on
14 > there is no mention of what ever happened from Gentoo that indicates
15 > anything improper took place.
16
17 Single-point samples are not really representative.
18
19 The messages wltjr sent and the bugs/PRs/etc he linked convinced me in
20 quite the contrary, at least, about the legitimacy of the current
21 actions.
22
23
24 --
25 Georg Rudoy

Replies