| 1 |
2010/6/8 José María <nimiux@g.o> |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:25:17PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:14:07 +0200 |
| 5 |
> > José María Alonso <nimiux@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > > I would be very pleased to maintain this package: |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > > app-doc/repodoc |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > > Is there any chance I can maintain this package?. What do |
| 12 |
> > > I have to do?. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > You could provide unified patches to the ebuilds to fix the four |
| 15 |
> > outstanding bugs[1] with the package. Someone should CC themselves on |
| 16 |
> > those bugs who has commit access for the thing to work, of course. |
| 17 |
> > Maybe the live (-9999) ebuild could use some work too. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Regards, |
| 21 |
> > jer |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=repodoc |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction. |
| 28 |
> I'll begin to work in those bugs. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Cheers. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Ok, then I won't mask this package for removal ( I was about to do it right |
| 33 |
now when I accidentally remembered this thread ) for now. If the bugs are |
| 34 |
still unresolved after 30 days I will have to mask it for removal. In the |
| 35 |
meantime, if you have working patches for the repodoc bugs [1], I can commit |
| 36 |
them for you and proxy this package for you until you gain tree access |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
[1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=repodoc |
Archives