| 1 |
On 11/03/2016 05:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> == Policy changes? == |
| 3 |
> I think that the following new policies could make sense: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> 1. Revision number must be no longer than 9999: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You likely mean "no higher than 9999", longer than would give large values |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> 1a. to make <=X-r9999 reliable, |
| 10 |
> 1b. to prevent pathological uses of revision as date. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Given revision in most cases is incremental (except for some -r100, |
| 13 |
-r200) cases, some structure here is likely good. I take it we're |
| 14 |
talking about devmanual changes in this case for policy? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 18 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 19 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives