Archives
Archives
| From: | Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-maintenance/removal: Process for virtual removal | ||
| Date: | Mon, 07 Sep 2020 12:47:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | CACfyCdV97z-RpuwsWdZEnWepGT0CFvO6DSKz5T5jecj_ojZOyg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-maintenance/removal: Process for virtual removal by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | Il giorno lun 7 set 2020 alle ore 14:10 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> ha |
| 2 | scritto: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > The devmanual [1] says that a revbump should be done when a new runtime |
| 5 | > dependency is added to an ebuild, but it doesn't say that for removal of |
| 6 | > a dependency. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > We are talking about the second case here, because the dependency on the |
| 9 | > virtual is being removed, while the dependency on its provider remains |
| 10 | > in place (it only changes from an indirect to a direct dependency). |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > Ulrich |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > [1] |
| 15 | > https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html |
| 16 | > |
| 17 | > That what's I've done here |
| 18 | https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13443#issuecomment-553764133 but you |
| 19 | decided to make me do a revbump. |
| 20 | Being consistent in decision is hard I see. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-maintenance/removal: Process for virtual removal | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-maintenance/removal: Process for virtual removal | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> |