| 1 |
if a bug is marked as RESOLVED, wouldn't that be even more reason to see it? |
| 2 |
if the bug you are experiencing has been resolved via a patch or whatever, |
| 3 |
wouldn't you be interested in the resolution? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Wednesday 11 August 2004 07:17 pm, Maurice van der Pot wrote: |
| 6 |
> Maybe I'm alone in this, but in general I do not want to see bugs that have |
| 7 |
> been marked RESOLVED. If I do ALL nfs (it is a problem with nfs), then I |
| 8 |
> get 83 hits. 18 of those are still open (and returned by just searching for |
| 9 |
> nfs) and 19 of those (18 open + mine) are still relevant. As the bug |
| 10 |
> database grows, this will become even more of a pain (think glibc, gcc, |
| 11 |
> portage, ...) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Regards, |
| 14 |
> Maurice. |
Archives